Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Damage-sensing recruitment of a lipid phosphatase couples lysosomal membrane repair to proteostatic adaptation
doi: 10.64898/2026.04.04.716461
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic illustrating the time course of lysosomal membrane damage-induced changes in ESCRTs, lysophagy, PI(4)P, PI(3)P, canonical mTORC1 signalling, and protein translation. Curves were modelled according to experimental data shown in [PI(3)P], (mTORC1), and (Lysophagy), [PI(4)P], (translation), (ESCRT). PI(3)P, mTORC1, and translations curves were normalized between 0 and 1 to allow for comparison of the kinetics. The ESCRT curve represents an average of CHMP4B, IST1, and Alix data . (b) Volcano plot illustrating the enrichment of proteasome subunits and ubiquitylation machinery on lysosomes immunoprecipitated from control or 1 h 1mM LLOMe-treated HEK293-TMEM192-3xHA cells determined by quantitative proteomics. (c) Representative confocal images of HMC3 and U2OS cells co-stained with DAPI and PSMB5 at indicated time points after 1mM LLOMe treatment. Scale bar, 10 µm. (d) Representative confocal images of 3 h 1mM LLOMe-treated HMC3 cells co-stained for the proteasome subunit PSBM5, Lamp1, and DAPI. Scale bar, 2 µm. (e) Left: representative immunoblot of U2OS-mScarlet-MTMR14 KI cells treated with DMSO control, 1 h 1mM LLOMe, or 5 h 1mM LLOMe. Right: densitometric quantification of mScarlet-MTMR14 relative to GAPDH in control, 1 h and 5 h LLOMe treatment from immunoblots as shown in the left panel. one-way ANOVA (n = 3 independent experiments). (f) Immunoblot of global ubiquitinated protein probed by FK2 antibodies in immunoprecipitation fractions collected from control or 2 h 1mM LLOMe-treated U2OS-mScarlet-MTMR14 KI cells with RFP-trap beads to enrich for mScarlet-MTMR14. (g) Representative confocal images of 2 h LLOMe-treated U2OS cells co-expressing mCherry-MTMR14 and eGFP-Ubiqutin. Scale bar, 10 µm. (h) Left: representative immunoblot of U2OS-mScarlet-MTMR14 KI cells treated with control (DMSO) or 5 h LLOMe with or without 3 µM TAK-243 co-incubation. Right: densitometric quantification of mScarlet-MTMR14 intensity/ ß-actin from immunoblots as shown in the left panel. t test (n = 4 independent experiments). Dotted line denotes mScarlet-MTMR14 level in controls set to 1. (i) Left: representative confocal live cell images of U2OS cells expressing GFP-2xFYVE imaged after treatment with 5 h LLOMe with or without 3 µM TAK-243. Scale bar, 10 µm. Right: number of PI(3)P puncta/cell area quantified in cells as shown in the left panel, fold change over control. t test (n = 3 independent experiments, total number of cells is 108 in LLOMe and 115 in LLOMe + TAK-243 conditions. (j) Quantification of mean LysoTracker intensity/field of view in U2OS cells treated with LLOMe for 5 h with or without 3 µM TAK-243 co-incubation, fold change over control. t test (n = 3 independent experiments, each data point represents 30 fields of view, one field of view containing 35-50 cells, with a size of 3328 × 3328 µm). (k) Left: representative immunoblot of U2OS-mScarlet-MTMR14 KI cells treated with DMSO control, 5 h LLOMe, or 5 h LLOMe with 200 nM Baf A1 and 2 µM Bortezomib. Right: densitometric quantification of mScarlet-MTMR14 relative to GAPDH from immunoblots as shown on the left panel. one-way ANOVA (n = 3 independent experiments). (l) Schematic illustration of MTMR14 recruitment to damaged lysosomes via calcium and sphingomyelin leading to local hydrolysis of PI(3)P during early lysosome damage. Upon prolonged lysosome damage, MTMR14 becomes ubiquitinated, and PI(3)P levels are restored. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Two-tailed unpaired t-test, paired t-test or one-sample t-tests were conducted using column statistics to compare the sample means to a hypothetical value of 1 or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. All bar graphs represent mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. See also .
Article Snippet: L-Leucyl-L-Leucine methyl ester hydrobromide (LLOME, Sigma, Cat# L7393, 1mM, 2mM), Gly-Phe-β-naphthylamide (GPN, Cayman Chemical, Cat# 14634, 200μM), O-methyl-serine dodecylamide hydrochloride (MSDH, Avanti Polar Lipids, Cat# 850546, 50μM), Benzalkonium chloride (BAC, CAS# 63449-41-2, MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA, 5ug/mL), hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 , Cat# ‘9681.2, Roth, 0.5mM), VPS34-IN1 (Selleckchem, Cat# S7980, 5μM), apilimod (Echelon Biosciences, Cat# B-0308, 50nM), rapamycin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Cat# sc-3504, 100nM), AZD8055 (AdooQ Bioscience/hölzel, Cat# A10114, 200nM), Anisomycin (Sigma, Cat# A9789, 30μM), LY2584702 (S6Ki, Selleckchem, Cat# S7704, 2μM, 5μM), MRT68921 dihydrochloride (MedChemExpress, Cat# 2080306-21-2, 1μM), bortezomib (MedChemExpress, Cat# 179324-69-7, 2μM), CCCP (Sigma, Cat# C2759-100MG, 10μM), Bafilomycin A1(Sigma, Cat# SML1661, 100nM or 200nM), nigericin (Invivogen, Cat# tlrl-nig,5μM), D-Mannitol (Sigma, Cat# M4125, 0.25M), Puromycin (InvivoGen, Cat# ant-pr-1, 2μM), Ionomycin (Calbiochem, Cat# 407952, 5μM), Doxycycline (Sigma, Cat# D-9891, 1μg/mL), Digitonin 5%(Thermo, Cat# BN20061, 20 mM).
Techniques: Membrane, Comparison, Immunoprecipitation, Control, Quantitative Proteomics, Staining, Western Blot, Expressing, Incubation, Two Tailed Test